Ciancio Ciancio Brown, P.C.
Book Now

Denver (303) 395-4773 Broomfield (303) 872-8919

Breckenridge (970) 285-3077 Toll-Free (800) 746-3560

We want to assure you during these challenging times that Ciancio Ciancio Brown, P.C. is open for business and providing our full range of legal services. Our attorneys, paralegals, and staff are available to meet with you for new and existing legal matters by conference call and video conferencing. Please call our main line at 303-451-0300 and we will get you connected. We are here to assist you with all of your ongoing legal needs.

Leaders in Litigation

College wins patent suit against Marvell Technology

When a company invents a new product, the first step is to obtain a patent. While the patent secures the inventing company's right to the property, enforcement of those rights is still required. That is why when a competitor makes, uses or sells a patented product without the patent holder's permission, it is imperative that intellectual property protection is pursued quickly and very aggressively. Colorado readers might find the following article on a recent intellectual property dispute interesting.

According to recent news reports a judge awarded Carnegie Mellon University more than $1.5 billion in a long-standing intellectual property dispute with Marvell Technology Group Ltd. According to news reports, Carnegie Mellon sued Marvell Technology for infringing on a patent it held for a particular chip it produced for computer hard drives. According to the suit, the patent was filed in 1998 and came from the work of a Carnegie Mellon Professor and former Carnegie student.

In 2012, a jury found in favor of the Pittsburgh-based university, holding Marvell Technology liable for willfully violating the patent that belonged to the school. Carnegie was asking for the damages awarded by the court to include interest from both before and after the judgment was entered. In the end, the $1.54 billion was based on the judge's decision that Carnegie is entitled to post0judgment interest and royalty payments but denied requests for additional damages and injunctive relief.

Patent litigation is incredibly complex. If successful, however, the patent holder could collect a significant amount of compensation. If the patent holder does decide to sue an infringing party they can also request an injunction to stop the infringing party from manufacturing or selling the particular item. In most cases where infringement is alleged, however, the alleged infringer will typically counter the allegation that they infringed on the patent by challenging the validity of the patent in question.

Source: Chron, "Judge awards CMU $1.54B in Marvell patent dispute," April 1, 2014

Email us your case details

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Broomfield Office
390 Interlocken Crescent
Suite 350
Broomfield, CO 80021

Toll Free: 800-746-3560
Phone: 303-872-8919
Fax: 303-464-8000
Broomfield Law Office Map

Denver Office
1660 Lincoln Street
Suite 2000
Denver, CO 80264

Toll Free: 800-746-3560
Phone: 303-395-4773
Denver Law Office Map

Breckenridge Office
106 North French Street
Suite 230
Breckenridge, CO 80424

Toll Free: 800-746-3560
Phone: 970-285-3077
Breckenridge Law Office Map

Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters.